Fabien CharneuxHands-on notes on operations and projectsFrançais

Notes · Manufacturing in Asia

China+1 is a question, not a strategy

Published

Supply chains are being redrawn, and the news coverage makes it sound simple. From a factory floor in Asia, it is not.

What the move looks like from here

Bag making shows it well. Brands have moved a large share of their production out of China in a few years, and Vietnam is one of the main destinations. Our own group made that move itself: after many years producing in China, it built its factory in Vietnam. Then the trade rules changed several times within a single year.

I have sourced in both directions: tooling and equipment from Asia for European plants, and now materials and customers across borders from Vietnam. Here is how I frame the question, using three ideas from my Executive MBA.

Three ideas to hold

  1. Total cost, not unit cost. Price per piece is the smallest part of the story. Lead time, inventory, quality, risk and exchange rates decide the real cost.
  2. Optionality has a price. A second source reduces risk and adds complexity. Decide what failure you are insuring against, and what you are willing to pay for it.
  3. Policy is an input, not a surprise. During the MBA residency in Washington we debated with a policy think tank, and I wrote an essay on global governance. My conclusion then still holds: leaders are rewarded for local, short-term agendas far more than for long-term global benefits, so trade rules will keep moving with domestic politics. Plan for that rather than hoping it settles.

A reading from Singapore

In the geopolitics module of the same MBA, in Singapore, our group asked whether the United States and China were heading into a Thucydides trap. Our answer in 2018 was: probably not a war, but a long economic and technology contest, with tariffs and production moving out of China. I now run a factory that is part of that move. The habit I kept is to ask who benefits when a rule changes, and to plan for both outcomes.

What I would ask before moving

  • What are we protecting: continuity, margin, access to a market or a customer requirement?
  • What is the total cost, once lead time, inventory and quality are counted?
  • What would a second source cost us in complexity, and who would own it?
  • Which rules could change, and what would we do on that day?

Questions this note answers

What does China+1 mean for a manufacturer?
Adding a second production or sourcing country beside China. It only works as a strategy once you know what you are protecting: continuity, cost, access to a market or a customer's requirement.
How should a buyer compare sourcing in China and Vietnam?
On total cost, not unit price: lead time, inventory, quality, risk and exchange rates. Then decide what a second source is worth, since it reduces risk and adds complexity.

Faced the same question, or see it differently? I like comparing notes. Get in touch →

← All notes · Home